Posts tagged ‘42 usc 1983’

• 

• Categories

  • Direct Appeal
  • Federal Habeas
  • State Habeas
  • Uncategorized

• Search

• Tags

  42 usc 1983 1054.9 actual innocence adequate and independent AEDPA appeal appealandhabeas cause and prejudice certificate of appealability certificate of probable cause clearly established Death penalty default discovery exhaustion extraordinary circumstances filter: Lord Kelvin forensics gangs habeas IAC informants interval tolling judicial notice jury instructions legislative intent negligence Orwellian nightmares that somehow became the status quo police misconduct postcard denial prosecutorial misconduct rendition sentencing special verdict statute of limitations substantial evidence successive petition terrorism timeliness tolling torture unreasonable application waiver Waltreus zoning

• Blogroll

  • At the Lectern
  • Cage Prisoners
  • California Appellate Law Blog
  • California Appellate Report
  • California Case Law
  • Center for Constitutional Rights
  • Crime and Consequences
  • emptywheel
  • Evolving Standards of Decency
  • Federal Public Defender Blog – CA Central District
  • Habeas Corpus Blog
  • How Appealing
  • Innocence Blog
  • Law and Disorder
  • Lawfare
  • Ninth Circuit Blog
  • ProPublica
  • Reprieve
  • SCOTUSblog
  • Section 1983 Blog
  • Sentencing Law and Policy Blog
  • Southern California Appellate News
  • The 28 USC 2254 Blog
  • The Ninth
  • The Public Record
  • Wall Street Journal Law Blog
  • Wrongful Convictions Blog

• California Media

  • KALW's The Informant Blog
  • LA Weekly
  • Los Angeles Times
  • Sacramento Bee
  • San Francisco Chronicle
  • San Jose Mercury News
  • SF weekly
  • The Recorder

• Legal Resources

  • Capital Defense Network
  • CCAP Pending Issues Page
  • National Legal Aid & Defender Association

• Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010

• RSS Feed

  • Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients: Cal Supreme Court on Medical Marijuana and Legislative “Aims” Versus Statutory Language
  • Medical Marijuana and Zoning: A Pair of Decisions from the Court of Appeal
  • Even Zohar Construction v. Bellaire Townhouses: How a Lawyer Should Properly Fall on His/Her Sword When Seeking Relief From Default
  • Spriesterbach v. Holland: Inferring Harmlessness of Instructional Error From the Language of a Special Verdict
  • Identity Defense Cases on Appeal, and Thoughts for Trial Strategy
  • Babb v. Lozowsky: Ninth Circuit on Clearly Established Federal Law
  • Ortiz v. Yates: Ninth Circuit on AEDPA Deference in Habeas Review Where State Court Evaluated Error as Purely a State-Law Issue
  • NYT: Close Guantanamo
  • CALCRIM in the morning…
  • Just Because It’s Latin, That Doesn’t Mean It Should be Italicized

Copyright 2013

Vigilance Theme by Jestro